← Back to Case Studies
RT&D EvidenceMay 2018

Kriel Power Station: Unit 6 Condenser RT&D Evidence

Prior Eskom RT&D work documenting Mexel®432 application observations, including condenser cleanliness factor and Terminal Temperature Difference (TTD) changes during the treatment period.

Executive Summary

Location

Kriel Power Station (South CW System, Unit 6)

Dosing Protocol

5ppm for 30 min/day

Key Result

Approx. 30% cleanliness-factor improvement within 3 days

1. The Challenge: Baseline Conditions

Prior to the intervention in May 2018, Unit 6 at Kriel Power Station was experiencing significant performance degradation due to condenser tube fouling. Baseline readings indicated poor heat transfer efficiency, severely impacting the unit's thermal performance.

  • Initial TTD (Terminal Temperature Difference): Averaged 13°C against a design target of 1.7°C.
  • Condenser Cleanliness Factor: Recorded at 29% at the start of the 12-17 May observation window.
  • Backpressure: Deviating 2.08 kPa above target optimum levels.

2. The Protocol

A multi-disciplinary team comprising Chemical Services, Auxiliary, and Process Engineering initiated a trial using Mexel®432 on the South Cooling Water (CW) system. The product is a non-oxidizing, film-forming amine emulsion designed to detach biofilm and scale while establishing an anti-corrosion barrier at the molecular level.

Application: The chemical was dosed into the center well of the CW South system. The rate was set to 5 ppm of 100% concentration Mexel®432/0, injected for just 30 minutes daily.

Measurement Methodology: Performance was tracked using real-time DCS (Distributed Control Systems) data via ProcessBook, LIMS, and STEP reports. Condenser efficiency was analyzed using the 4-temperature methodology (Gibbard & Terranova) measuring TTD and backpressure deviation.

3. Measured Results

The intervention produced measurable changes in the monitored condenser indicators during the first 72 hours of dosage.

MetricBefore / Early ObservationReported Later Observation
Condenser Cleanliness Factor (12-17 May)29%69%
Terminal Temp. Diff (TTD) - West12.10°C6.01°C - 8.22°C
Actual TTD vs Target (1.7°C)13°C4.3°C
Backpressure Deviation+2.08 kPa+0.6 kPa

Eskom RT&D Conclusion Summary

The report conclusion records approximately 30% improvement in condenser cleanliness factor within 3 days and notes improved TTD for Unit 6 based on condenser efficiency analysis.

— Official Report RTD/ACM/18/240-142764661

Microbiology Notes

The report includes two separate microbiology references. The Kriel South CW field table records approximately 80% reduction in microbiological count, but the report cautions that monthly microbiology results alone do not justify the chemical performance. The same section refers to a lab biocide comparison in which Mexel®432 reduced total aerobic bacteria by 93% and total anaerobic bacteria by 91%.

4. Derived Heat-Rate and Emissions Review

TTD, TR and backpressure data can support a heat-rate review when assessed against comparable load and ambient conditions. These indicators should be treated as engineering evidence rather than a universal savings claim.

The reported backpressure deviation change from 2.08 kPa to 0.6 kPa is relevant to derived heat-rate and emissions calculations, but any fuel or CO₂ figure requires a site-specific model and independent review before commercial use.

Validate this approach for your station

Our engineering team can review your current TTD and backpressure data to assess whether a structured baseline and monitored deployment is technically appropriate.